The most compelling evidence opposing the need for organic foods comes from nutrient comparisons between organic and non-organic foods.
Organic foods may not contain considerably more nutrients than other foods, according to lab studies, and proponents of conventional foods have interpreted this to suggest that organic foods are no better or healthier than conventional foods.
This would be a persuasive argument against the necessity for organic foods if the number of nutrients in a food were the only thing that mattered, but nutrients are only one component of food. You can also use organic sea moss products for good health.
Image Source: Google
The finest quality of organic foods has less to do with how many nutrients they contain and more to do with what they don't include.
Unwanted ingredients are frequently introduced to regular foods throughout the growing and/or processing stages. Fruits and vegetables, for example, are frequently treated with pesticides or other harmful compounds.
Pesticides, hormones, antibiotics, and other chemicals may be present in foods, but this information will not be displayed on the label.
Organic products, on the other hand, must adhere to tight guidelines, which include not utilizing harmful compounds like pesticides at any point along the supply chain, from start to finish.
Organic meals are certainly healthier than their normal counterparts due to the absence of these unhealthy substances, even if the foods contain the same number of nutrients.
Basically, every food has some nutrients that are beneficial for you and others that are harmful for you, and foods with the most healthy nutrients and the fewest unhealthy ones are the healthiest foods, and vice versa.
As a result, even if a dish contains a good number of nutrients, it might still be unhealthy if it also contains a lot of unhealthy ingredients.